Over the next two months, Republican Party chapters across the
country will be hosting their annual Lincoln Day dinners, reflecting on
the pivotal leadership of the GOP’s first
president and pledging to carry his principles into the future.
Guests will be regaled with speeches from party leaders, candidates,
and grassroots activists. They’ll speak of Lincoln’s wisdom,
Republicans’ fight to end slavery, and parallels between the Civil War
and today’s political battles. They’ll congratulate each other for
whatever gains their local party can claim. They’ll sing the praises of
conservative principles. And they’ll put as optimistic a spin as
possible on the elections to come.
But most speakers won’t address the subject in most desperate need of
attention: how unworthy the modern-day Republican Party is to invoke
Lincoln’s name.
Abraham Lincoln preserved the United States through the most harrowing crisis we had yet faced. He fought
back
political, judicial, and military attacks on the equal, unalienable
rights of every American, understanding that the blight of slavery
threatened not only black Americans, but also the principles of the
Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
In staking his political life on the proposition that the Founders’
values were worth preserving, that they would not become obsolete simply
because future generations found them inconvenient—indeed, that this
was when they would be
most relevant, as “a stumbling block to
those who in after times might seek to turn a free people back into the
hateful paths of despotism”—Lincoln became, in effect, the first
conservative.
How well is the Republican Party living up to that legacy these days?
Today’s slavery, abortion, has claimed over 56 million innocents since a Supreme Court ruling just as bankrupt as
Dred Scott
unleashed it. Yet most Republicans seem to, at best, treat the
slaughter as just one of many equally weighty policy subjects, and at
worst, seek to abandon the pro-life cause out of political cowardice.
For instance, party leaders in Minnesota folded like a cheap tent
when liberals complained about a graphic comparing abortion to slavery
that apeared on their Facebook page. The Wisconsin Senate’s Republican
majority leader, Scott Fitzgerald, has repeatedly delayed the scheduling
of pro-life bills that have the votes to pass. The National Republican
Congressional Committee saw fit to donate to the congressional runs of
openly pro-abortion candidates such as Richard Tisei and Carl DeMaio.
Indeed, Democrats force on every judicial nominee the presumption that
they must either openly endorse
Roe v. Wade or at least respect its status as “precedent,” yet rarely do Republican senators force their colleagues to defend
Roe’s unearned legitimacy.
Americans who escape prenatal execution grow up to find a government
trying its hardest to prove that money is almost literally no object, to
the detriment of economic and religious liberty alike. The president
implements a burdensome healthcare regulation scheme the people never
wanted with shockingly little regard for what the text Congress sent to
his desk actually says, wreaking completely needless havoc in the lives
of millions, and Republican leaders can’t stop bickering with the base
long enough to work out a strategy to protect the country from it.
This week, the White House and its apologists descended so far into
self-parody that they actually attempted to spin a drop of over two
million jobs as a
good thing, because, in Nancy Pelosi’s words,
ObamaCare will “shift how people make a living and reach their
aspirations”…at the expense of their fellow taxpayers.
In response, our leaders brainstorm “paths to prosperity” that would
purportedly set things right if implemented, but display virtually no
vision on how to push back media narratives that keep from actually
standing a chance at enactment. They can, however inexplicably take
their eye off the devastatingly potent case against ObamaCare to focus
their attention on immigration legislation that is virtually guaranteed
to give the party of ever-expanding, post-constitutional government a
nigh-insurmountable influx of future voters. And that’s despite the fact
that the public keeps telling them immigration “reform” isn’t one of
their priorities; in fact, in Pew’s most recent survey, “dealing with
illegal immigration” ranks a dismal sixteenth place, far behind economic
healing and fiscal solvency. It even lost out to platitudes nobody
takes any politicians seriously on, like “protecting the environment”
and “reducing the influence of lobbyists.”
And while all this is going on nationally, heaven forbid they notice
the thousands of other ways despotism flares up across the country, from
small entrepreneurs facing fines and imprisonment for declining to
participate in same-sex weddings to a Justice Department desperate to
disenfranchise voters who enact the most benign of voter-ID laws and
defaming them as racists trying to keep minorities from the polls. Those
who vote Republican in hopes of finding protection from such tyranny
can’t help but feel abandoned.
That’s not to say GOP leaders don’t do
anything—they can,
apparently, make grand displays of standing up to dime-store demagogues
working for failing leftist news channels. MSNBC’s cabal of lunatic
character assassins richly deserves public shaming, but would it kill
Reince Priebus to muster half of the passion he found for Tweet-gate and
direct it at the people actually controlling levers of government?
Conservatives want—and the country needs—more than entertaining show
fights against slow-moving, ultimately inconsequential targets.
Lincoln presided over a period where America’s very soul was at
stake, and he spoke frankly about how the conflicts of his day
transcended mere partisan one-upsmanship to direct ramifications for
basic human decency. He bemoaned the “progress in degeneracy” that
carved out exception after exception to the maxim that “all men are
created equal.” “When it comes to this,” he wrote, “I should prefer
emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty
— to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and
without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic].”
To make Lincoln Days matter for more than just fundraising and
hobnobbing, this is the spirit they need to adopt—sober, self-critical
appraisal of just how grave the national situation is and what it will
take to set things right. If the man Republicans honor at these dinners
could do it through the bloodiest war in our history, then surely
Republicans doing it in the face of an unscrupulous opposition party and
a hostile press isn’t too much to expect.