Here is a man that has made and still makes his living off the the people of the United States. He has taken an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign or domestic but has no plan to uphold that oath. He is a disgrace to the uniform and to America. "Molon Labe"
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
December 6, 2013
Image: Col. Robert Bateman (CapitalLinkWorld.com).
Lt. Col. Robert Bateman, the second amendment-hating
Army Officer who caused controversy after vowing to “pry your gun from
your cold, dead, fingers,” works closely with the Department of Homeland
Security.
Earlier this week, Bateman, an active military commander, penned a piece for Esquire magazine in
which he promised to push for a total ban on all firearms besides
muskets, shotguns and rifles, and shut down all gun manufacturers except
for those who produced weapons for the federal government and the armed
forces (you will be disarmed, the state will have a monopoly on
firepower).
Bateman is president and founder of Alliance Defense Marketing Associates LLC, a “global premier risk management” firm that does work for the DHS.
According to the company’s website, part of the services
offered by the firm include, “Homeland Security operational
initiatives.”
According to Bateman’s official LinkedIn page, he also personally specializes in “Defense/Homeland Security/Law Enforcement operational initiatives.”
That’s ironic given that while Bateman is lecturing the American people about their gun rights, the DHS is simultaneously buying assault rifles and acquiring billions of rounds of ammunition.
Critics contend that
Bateman’s revulsion for the second amendment (which he woefully
misinterprets) “proves he knows nothing about the Constitution he swore
an oath to defend.”
Bateman’s promise to “pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers” was
an inflammatory reference to his advocacy for making it illegal for
guns on his imaginary blacklist to be inherited. “I am willing to wait
until you die, hopefully of natural causes,” wrote Bateman.
Later in the article, Bateman says disarming the
American people is all about encouraging “less violence and death,”
although such sentiments weren’t evident when he became embroiled in an
argument with a blogger which ended up with the Colonel making a thinly
veiled death threat.
The argument concerned a former senior female Human Terrain Team (HTT) member who was allegedly subjected to a death threat by an active duty lieutenant at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.
After Bateman engaged in “ad hominem attacks” against
Maximilian Forte, the blogger who posted the story, and was subsequently
banned, he resorted to a veiled death threat of his own.
“And I apologize for the future. Not really my fault. But I am sorry nonetheless,” wrote Bateman.
“You apologize for the future. It was worth approving
your message just so that others can see the veiled threat,” responded
Forte.
Bateman repeated the threat in a subsequent post when he remarked, “And again, Max, truly, I am sorry for your future.”
Bateman’s thinly veiled death threats reveal him to be a
wolf in sheep’s clothing, someone who claims to be all about reducing
violence yet resorts to barely disguised rhetorical threats of violence
against his ideological adversaries.
It seems abundantly clear that it is Bateman who has a
problem with violence and is most likely a danger to himself and those
around him. It is therefore Bateman, and not the American people, who
should be disarmed.
Feel free to politely email Col. Bateman and let him know what you think about his views on the second amendment.
No comments:
Post a Comment